Another of the characteristics of learning through work is that the learning experience of each student is unique, since each learning environment is different.
According to Gerber1, there are eleven different ways by which workers learn;
Through this approach, the student demonstrated that (s)he was able to:
A much more open approach to learning is to provide the student with a copy of the syllabus for one or more modules and ask him/her to describe how the theory and principles listed in the syllabus are applied within the organisation for which they work.
Since each student has a different working environment, the opportunities to learn and apply the academic knowledge will vary from student to student. Using this approach, therefore, the learning must be negotiated, and the use of learning agreements may be beneficial2,3.
This approach can work successfully with a mature student, who has significant work experience but lacks an understanding of the processes, procedures and products with which they are familiar. The relevance of the learning is immediately obvious, and this assists student motivation. This is important, because the lack of rigid structure inherent in this approach may leave the student feeling isolated within the learning process.
A third example was provided by a student who demonstrated and developed his knowledge by writing a technical manual for the company. This was designed to be a training aid for process operatives within the manufacturing operation, so there were expected to be company benefits as well as personal educational benefits to the student.
The manual covered:
Company reference sources were used to support the development of the manual as well as academic text books.
There was an unexpected additional benefit from this work. In carrying out background reading for the manual, the student developed an increased awareness of the benefits of process control to the quality of the product. The student was able to disseminate his improved understanding to the workforce and product quality levels improved as a result.
![]()